Logic and Conversation: Fall 2022

Term papers

The course has ended and has led to some very interesting term papers:

• Ferreol Lavaud: A note about propositional attitudes justification
• Elynn Weijland: A Uniform Account of the Dutch of in Inquisitive Semantics
• Ioli Tente: Intrigue, Puzzle, Fascinate and Theories of Clausal Complementation
• Flip Lijnzaad: Responding to negative biased polar questions using Dutch wel
• Sarah Dukic: How might generates alternatives when interacting with connectives
• Timo Diedering: Division of labour and high-negation polar questions
• Tianyi Chu: Inquisitive Semantics for Question-sensitive Awareness

Prerequisites

Good working knowledge of first-order logic is required (see for instance the first three chapters of this book). It is also convenient to have some background in formal semantics (see for instance this book), though this is not strictly required. For students of the Master of Logic, it is typically best to take this course in the second year of the programme, after having taken Meaning, Reference and Modality and Structures for Semantics during the first year. There may be exceptions, depending on your specific background.

Textbook

The first part of the course uses a textbook. The book is open access, so everyone can download a pdf for free. If you prefer a hardcopy, you can order one at amazon or other online bookstores.

Grading

The grade will be based on two homework assignments (each counting for 20%) and a final paper (60%).

Assignments

• A latex template for drawing inquisitive semantics diagrams can be downloaded here.
• Assignment 1 was posted on Monday 31/10 and was due on Monday 14/11 before class.
• Assignment 2 was posted on Monday 14/11 and was due on Monday 28/11 before class.
  

Instructions for final paper

The final paper must written individually. Please discuss possible topics with us early on in the course. Topics should be determined by November 30 at the very latest and should be communicated to us by that date. A preliminary version of the paper is to be presented during the last lecture on December 14, and the final version is due on December 22, 6pm. See Appendix B of the textbook and the inquisitive semantics website for pointers to some relevant literature, which may help in finding an interesting topic. We strongly encourage students to discuss their projects with each other and give each other feedback.

Grading criteria for final paper

The grading criteria for the final paper are the same as for a master thesis, though of course here we do not expect as much as in the case of a thesis.

1. Correctness All claims should be correct, precisely formulated and carefully argued for.
2. Writing The paper should be well-structured; the writing should be clear and concise. Typically, papers are around 10 pages. There is no official upper or lower bound, but quality is preferred over quantity: a single idea or result that is clearly explained in 7 pages is better than a collection of multiple half-baked ideas discussed in 15 pages.
3. Difficulty Both conceptual and technical difficulty are taken into account.
4. Originality The paper should contain some new results. This can take many forms: establishing previously unknown properties of one of the logical systems discussed in class, or closely related ones; further enriching the theories discussed; testing the predictions of the theories; developing new applications; developing a theory of your own that solves some of the remaining challenges for the theories discussed.

Late policy

Deadlines are strict. Late submissions will be accepted until three days after the deadline, but 0.5 points will be subtracted from the grade per day.