Logic and Conversation: Fall 2026

• Amsterdam • Master of Logic, University of Amsterdam

Traditionally, logic is concerned with the characterization of valid reasoning and argumentation, and therefore identifies the meaning of a sentence with its truth conditions. When analyzing the meaning of sentences in conversation, however, other notions become of interest as well. The focus of the course will be on inquisitive semantics, which enriches the traditional truth-conditional approach in ways that allow for a more comprehensive formal analysis of the meaning of sentences in linguistic interaction. The course introduces the basic inquisitive semantics framework, and discusses some current research on the semantics of questions. Specifically, this year, toward the end of the course, we will discuss some recent work on how questions are expressed and interpreted in sign languages.

Jump to schedule

Prerequisites

A good working knowledge of first-order logic is expected (see for instance the first three chapters of this book). It is also convenient to have some background in formal semantics (see for instance this book), though this is not strictly required. For students of the Master of Logic, this course is usually taken in the second year of the programme, after having completed Meaning, Reference and Modality and Structures for Semantics during the first year. Master and PhD students in Linguistics, AI, Cognitive Science and other programmes are also very welcome to take this course.

Textbook

The first part of the course uses a textbook. The book is open access, so everyone can download a pdf for free. If you prefer a hardcopy, you can order one at Bol, Amazon, or other online bookstores.

Grading and homework

  • The grade for this course is based on a final paper.
  • There will also be homework exercises but these won’t be graded.
  • Questions about the homework exercises can be asked during office hours.
  • A latex template for drawing inquisitive semantics diagrams can be downloaded here.

Office hours

There will be four office hours:

  • 9/11 at 13.00-14.00
  • 17/11 at 11.00-12.00
  • 23/11 at 13.00-14.00
  • 30/11 at 13.00-14.00

The office hours will be held in room L6.31 at LAB42. During office hours you can discuss questions you may have about your homework exercises, or ideas for your final paper.

Instructions for final paper

The final paper must be written individually. Please discuss possible topics with me early on in the course. Topics should be determined by November 25 at the very latest and should be communicated to me by that date, either in class or by email. A preliminary version of the paper is to be presented during the last lecture on December 9, and the final version is due on December 18, 6pm. See Appendix B of the textbook and the inquisitive semantics website for pointers to some relevant literature, which may help in finding an interesting topic. You are strongly encouraged to discuss your projects with other students and give each other feedback, but each paper should be written individually.

Policy on the use of AI tools

It is permitted to use generative AI tools as a collaborative assistant for:

  • Brainstorming: Generating potential paper topics or identifying interesting research questions.
  • Line editing: Checking spelling and grammar mistakes.

It is prohibited to use generative AI tools for:

  • Draft generation: Using AI to write entire paragraphs, sections, or the complete draft of your term paper.
  • Literature sourcing: Relying on AI to find primary sources (AI tools frequently invent or “hallucinate” fake academic citations).
  • Unverified claims: Presenting factual claims generated by an AI tool without verifying them through credible, peer-reviewed sources.

Grading criteria for final paper

The grading criteria for the final paper are the same as for a master thesis, though of course here we do not expect as much as in the case of a thesis.

  1. Correctness All claims should be correct, precisely formulated and carefully argued for.
  2. Writing The paper should be well-structured; the writing should be clear and concise. Typically, papers are around 10 pages. There is no official upper or lower bound, but quality is preferred over quantity: a single idea or result that is clearly explained in 7 pages is better than a collection of multiple half-baked ideas discussed in 15 pages.
  3. Difficulty Both conceptual and technical difficulty are taken into account.
  4. Originality The paper should contain some new results. This can take many forms: establishing previously unknown properties of one of the logical systems discussed in class, or closely related ones; further enriching the theories discussed; testing the predictions of the theories; developing new applications; developing a theory of your own that solves some of the remaining challenges for the theories discussed.

Late policy

The deadline for the final paper is strict. Late submissions will in principle not be accepted.

Schedule

Mondays 11.00-13.00, Wednesdays 11.00-13.00

# Date Room Material Content Lecturer
The inquisitive semantics framework
1 2/11 L1.11 Book Ch.1 Course overview and introduction Floris
2 4/11 L1.11 Book Ch.2 Basic notions in inquisitive semantics Floris
3 9/11 L1.11 Book Ch.3 Main operations on propositions in inquisitive semantics
Exercises: 3.1, 3.2, 3.6
Office hour after class.
Floris
4 11/11 L1.11 Book Ch.4 Inquisitive semantics for a first-order logical language
Exercises: 4.1 (items 1-3), 4.2, 4.3
Floris
5 16/11 L1.11 Book Ch.5-6 Inquisitive semantics for declarative and interrogative sentences in English.
For the exactly one implication of alternative questions see Roelofsen 2017 and Westera 2019.
Exercises: 5.3
Office hour the next day.
Floris
6 18/11 L1.11 Book Ch.8 Inquisitive semantics for attitude verbs
Exercises: 8.1, 8.4
Tomasz Klochowicz (TBC)
7 23/11 L1.11 Book Ch.9 Comparison with other frameworks
Exercises: 9.2, 9.3
Office hour after class.
Floris
Recent and ongoing work on questions in sign languages
8 25/11 L1.11 Klomp 2021 Introduction to sign languages, Dutch Sign Language (NGT) in particular
Watch a nice documentary: Doof Kind
Learn some Dutch Sign Language with our app: Signio
Deadline for paper topics
Tobias de Ronde (TBC)
9 30/11 L1.11 Oomen et al. 2026 Polar questions in NGT: a production study
Office hour after class.
Floris
10 2/12 L1.11 Polar questions in NGT: corpus study and comprehension study Floris
11 7/12 L1.13 Practical applications for sign language learners Floris
12 9/12 L1.11 Project presentations Students